Drawing for THINKFIT

USPTO serial 78446309

THINKFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THINKFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly D. McKay

MOLLY D MCKAY MOLLY D MCKAY PC3207 E 22ND STTULSA, OK 74114-1823UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the need for disease preventionABANDONEDApr 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 6, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 6, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 17, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance