Drawing for U-STORE "THE AREA'S 1ST SELF-STORAGE COMPANY"

USPTO serial 78446354

U-STORE "THE AREA'S 1ST SELF-STORAGE COMPANY"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with U-STORE "THE AREA'S 1ST SELF-STORAGE COMPANY"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Traphagen

Mark Traphagen Traphagen Law PLLC910 17th Street NW - Suite 800Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Moving and storage related services, namely, moving van rentals and services and renting of self-storage facilities to othersACTIVEOct 3, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 23, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 20, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 21, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 25, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 3, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance