Drawing for MISCHIEF

USPTO serial 78446624

MISCHIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISCHIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Schwartz

Robert M. Schwartz ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ, P.A.P.O. Box 221470Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003INDOOR AND OUTDOOR TANNING PREPARATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 17, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 19, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance