USPTO serial 78447051
ARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Basile, Reg. No. 24753
ANDREW R BASILE, REG. NO. 24753 YOUNG & BASILE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AFTERMARKET, NON-STRUCTURAL AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE AND ENGINE PARTS, NAMELY, ENGINES, GAS CAPS, WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADES, TURN SIGNALS FOR VEHICLES, HORNS FOR VEHICLES, UNIVERSAL JOINTS, SHOCK ABSORBERS, VEHICLE STRUTS AND STRUT BEARING PLATES THEREFORE, DRIVE SHAFTS, BRAKES AND BRAKE PARTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, BRAKE BACKING PLATES, BRAKE BOOSTERS, BRAKE CABLES, BRAKE CALIPERS, BRAKE DRUMS AND ROTORS, BRAKE HARDWARE, BRAKE HOSES, BRAKE LINES AND FITTINGS, BRAKE PADS, BRAKE SHIMS, BRAKE CALIPER BRACKETS AND BRAKE SHOES, AXLE AND WHEEL BEARINGS, AXLE BOOT KITS, TRUCK AIR BRAKE HOSES, CLUTCHES AND CLUTCH PARTS, NAMELY, CLUTCH CABLES, CLUTCH BEARING RELEASE MECHANISMS, CLUTCH LININGS, CLUTCH PILOT BUSHINGS, WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTORS, TRANSMISSIONS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREOF, ENGINE REBUILD KITS SOLD AS A UNIT, FUEL TANKS AND STRAPS THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT, MOTOR MOUNTS, ACCELERATOR CABLES, SUSPENSION PARTS, NAMELY, COIL SPRINGS, FOUR WHEEL DRIVE HUBS FOR CARS, TRUCKS, VANS AND BUSES, SEAT BELTS FOR USE IN VEHICLES, STEERING BOOT KITS, LAND VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, DRIVE GEARS, BRAKE WHEEL CYLINDERS, WHEEL STUDS AND LUG NUTS, POWER STEERING UNITS AND PARTS THEREOF, WINDOW LIFT MOTORS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR POWER WINDOWS, STRUCTURAL PARTS OF VEHICLES, NAMELY, TRUNK LIDS AND TRUNK SUPPORTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |