Drawing for IP2

USPTO serial 78447854

IP2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IP2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

Lynne E. Graybeal PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific research; biotechnological, medical, pharmaceutical and chemical research and analysis; scientific research, development and analysis in the fields of biotechnology devices, tools and reagents, molecular signal detection technology, and bioactivation technology; passive molecular signal detection; recording and processing of molecular signals; mapping and analysis of detected molecular signals; scientific research in the fields of genetic sequencing and engineering; development and analysis of electronic databases of digital datasets and signals related to all of the above; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable electronic databases of digital datasets and signals related to all of the aboveACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 10, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 12, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 12, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 13, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 7, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 21, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Mar 20, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 20, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 17, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance