USPTO serial 78448202
RETAIL INTEGRATION INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008078Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RETAIL INTEGRATION INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marta S. Levine
MARTA S LEVINE QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2550MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services for retailing companies in the areas of product demand, marketing, manufacturing, purchasing, distribution, packaging, transportation and logistics; and statistical analysis and financial statement analysis rendered in connection therewith; promoting the sale of goods of others through the creation, assembly, and distribution of promotional displays and promotional materials; packaging articles to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |