Drawing for AGI

USPTO serial 78448501

AGI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Kelly

TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, asset management services, investment advice, investment consultation and management of funds for others, financial management and consulting, services relating to capital investment, bond purchasing services, mutual fund services, administration of mutual funds and unit trusts, pension fund management services, risk management services, investment trust services, investment brokerage services, brokerage services for securities, brokerage services for capital investment, advisory services relating to financial investments, namely investment management, investment advice, funds investment, investment consultation and investment of funds for others, fiduciary trust stock and securities, brokerage services for stocks and bonds, financial planning services,and financial investment in the field of securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 3, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance