Drawing for KICKS STOPS

USPTO serial 78448616

KICKS STOPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KICKS STOPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Daucher, Timothy L. Epp, Carlo F. Van den Bosch, Michelle M. LaVoie

BRIAN M DAUCHER SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4TH FL650 TOWN CTR DRCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 9, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance