Drawing for BIODER.MET.IX

USPTO serial 78449137

BIODER.MET.IX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIODER.MET.IX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth J. Hovet

KENNETH J HOVET NORDMAN, CORMANY, HAIR & COMPTONPO BOX 9100OXNARD, CA 93031-9100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE—
005Medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 24, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 23, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance