Drawing for SPYWARE DOCTOR

USPTO serial 78449485

SPYWARE DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3282350Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SPYWARE DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel, Esq.

Sally M. Abel, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in scanning computer hard drives, memory, and operating system registries to detect and remove unwanted programs, namely malware, adware and spyware, and manuals therefore, but not including providing computer software for diagnosing computer hardware functioning, efficiency, operation and problems; downloadable computer software for use in scanning computer hard drives, memory, and operating system registries to detect and remove unwanted programs, namely, malware, adware and spyware, and manuals therefore; but not including providing computer software for diagnosing computer hardware functioning, efficiency, operation and problems; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of brochures and manuals on the subjects of unwanted computer programs, namely malware, adware and spywareSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 27, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 13, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 31, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 11, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 25, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 29, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance