Drawing for NATUREWALK

USPTO serial 78450324

NATUREWALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATUREWALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gayle Cramer

GAYLE CRAMER CLARK, PARTINGTON, HART, LARRY, BOND & S125 W ROMANA ST STE 800PENSACOLA, FL 32502-5856UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and business services for residential developers and owners, consisting of promotion, sales, and rental management for single and multi-family dwellings and their related recreational facilitiesACTIVE—
037Building construction and real estate development services, namely development and construction of single and multi-family dwellings and recreational facilities for theme-based residential developments that focus on environmentally protected land use and walking trailsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 1, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance