USPTO serial 78450824
MAYAN HERITAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAYAN HERITAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Brettin, Esq.
Lee Brettin, Esq. Brettin Law OfficeSuite 1011833 N. 105th StreetSeattle, WA 98133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PROCESSED CHOCOLATE BEANS; CHOCOLATE; CANDY; CHOCOLATE BARS; CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES; CHOCOLATE COATED DRIED FRUITS AND BERRIES; CONFECTIONS, NAMELY FRUIT BASED CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDIES, HEALTH BARS, NAMELY GRANOLA-BASED CHOCOLATE COVERED SNACK BARS, READY TO EAT CHOCOLATE COVERED CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |