USPTO serial 78451187
GANT ADVENTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GANT ADVENTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miami Lakes, FL
131 92 NACKA STRAND, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Thomas Perry
JAMES THOMAS PERRY JAMES T PERRYELIZABETH ARDEN, INC 200 PARK AVE S 7NEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eau de toilette, cologne, aftershave and shaving balm, bath gel and shower gel, and deodorant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |