USPTO serial 78452350
BRAND NAME OUTLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAND NAME OUTLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination of business classified advertising and advertisements for others via a global computer network; conduction of auction retail services for others via a global computer network; and computerized on-line retail store services in the fields of cosmetics and pharmaceutical preparations, clothing, vitamins and nutritional supplements, books, medical devices, alcoholic beverages, art pictures, fruits and vegetables, audiotapes, videotapes, automotive aftermarket products, baby products, traveling bags and luggage, bakery goods, weightlifting equipment, bathroom accessories, stuffed plush toys, boxes, brooms and mops, cabinets, candles, cameras, cars and trucks, medical equipment, pet products, chocolate and candies, cigarettes, cigars and other smoker's articles, cleaning equipment, fabrics and cloth, jewelry, bedding supplies, namely, mattresses, sheets, covers, pillowcases and covers, dental products, namely, toothbrushes and toothpaste, dishwashers and washing machines, plumbing supplies and plumbing products, electrical supplies, china and glassware, earthmoving machines, fencing products, filing cabinets and office equipment, typewriters, wordprocessors, firearms, fishing equipment, fishing reels and fishing rods, golf equipment, tennis equipment and tennis rackets, floral products, frames for pictures, furniture, toys and games, garbage disposal equipment, musical instruments, hair care products, knives, lamps and lighting fixtures, lawnmowers, meat, neckwear, oil, ovens, packaging equipment, painting equipment and paint, paper products, pets, pumps, stereo equipment, television sets, monitors, roofing supplies, boating equipment and boats, seeds and fertilizers, fish, shoes, office supply products and stationery, storage equipment, surgical equipment, surfboards, swimming pools, telescopes and optical equipment, textiles, tools, trees and plants, umbrellas, raincoats and rain wear, vacuum cleaners, watches, x-ray equipment, and yarn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |