USPTO serial 78452518
CONCEIVED BY BABIES. MADE BY MOMS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCEIVED BY BABIES. MADE BY MOMS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik P. Belt, Bruce D. Sunstein; Lee C. Bromberg; Robert L. Kann; Robert M. Asher; Steven G. Saunders; Julia Huston; Lisa M. Tittemore; Kerry L. Timbers; Lisa M. Fleming; Keith E. Toms; Courtney M. Quish; Peter J. Karol; Nicole A. Rizzo; Paul S. Kitchin;
ERIK P. BELT BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | washcloths and towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for infants and children, namely gowns, sweaters, sweat pants and sweat shirts, socks, mittens, gloves, hats, scarves, underwear and undershirts, jackets, bathrobes, booties, thermal underwear, summer cover ups and winter outerwear, namely, jackets, coats and snow suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taggies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Taggies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CONCEIVED BY BABIES. MADE BY MOMS.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |