Drawing for TITO

USPTO serial 78453280

TITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maureen R. Smith

MAUREEN R SMITH LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604-2592UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Accumulators; lithium batteries, batteries, electrolytic batteries, alkaline batteries, Ni-Cd batteries, carbon-zinc batteries, nickel-metal hydride batteries, photovoltaic cells, primary batteries, plate batteries, batteries for vehicles, batteries for cell phones, solar batteriesABANDONEDMay 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance