USPTO serial 78453440
HOZELOCK EASYCLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOZELOCK EASYCLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buckinghamshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Garden pond fountain pumps and garden pond fountain pump systems, consisting, namely, of a pump, fountain heads, a filter, an ultraviolet clarifier, power cable, ball joints for leveling of the fountain head, feet for stability, and fountain stem extensions for varying pond depths, all sold as a unit and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |