USPTO serial 78454078
HI5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HI5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Mulholland
SUSAN M MULHOLLAND GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109-4316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Chalk for playing games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, balloons; hobby craft kits for candy-making, for use in making children's molded figures, for use in making jewelry and hair accessories, for children for making and decorating fingernails, for toy modeling consisting of toy modeling dough, dough cutters, moulds, tools and tool kits, for making laces, for toy modeling comprising 3-D moulds and casting powders, for use in making pictures and puzzles comprising wood shapes, for making dolls and accessories therefor, and for making toy animals and stuffed toys; action skill games, crib toys; dolls, doll clothes, and accessories therefor; marionette puppets; board games; checker sets comprising checkerboards and checkers; chess games comprising chessboards and chess pieces; draught sets comprising of draughtboards and draughts; targets; mah-jong; skittles; counters for games; cups for dice; dice; marbles for games; dominoes; bowling pins, namely, ninepins; snow globes; toy soap bubbles; spinning tops; hand-held units for playing electronic and video games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only, namely, hand-held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; automatic and coin-operated amusement machines, excluding mechanical action toys. outdoor activity games, namely, badminton sets, games involving throwing devices at a target, tossing rings and pegs, lawn darts and targets, flying ringers and stakes, backyard tennis racquets and balls, and hook-and-loop type catching mitts and balls, jump ropes, bubble making wands and solutions, sticks and rods, for juggling, table tennis tables and paddles, bat and ball games, play paddling pools and play tents; kites; kite reels; swing sets; toy butterfly nets; piñatas; toy scooters; skateboards; rubber, plastic, and latex playing balls; role playing games; models, namely, toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units, toy model train sets, scale model airplanes; toy vehicles; radio-controlled toy vehicles; puzzles, namely, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, 3-D puzzles; floor puzzles; toy building blocks; water squirting toys; flippers for swimming; play swimming pools; bathtub toys; flying discs; twirling batons; horseshoe games, namely, horseshoes and stakes for recreational purposes; quoits; ring games; practical jokes, namely, jack-in-the-boxes; playing cards; bingo cards; plush toys; soft sculpture toys; teddy bears; children's multi-activity toys; rocking horses; theatrical masks; theatrical toy masks; novelties for parties and dances, namely, party favors in the nature of small toys; toy mobiles; 2-D or 3-D colorform activity and play sets that may or may not contain embedded musical recordings, made of static vinyl, felt, foam or magnetic material for use in any environment and that incorporate pre-cut materials that form play surfaces and repositional play pieces for attachment to the play surfaces; kaleidoscopes; toys for domestic pets; all of the foregoing excluding toys, games and playthings specifically marketed for use in sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |