USPTO serial 78454589
POKA DOTT TRINKET & PARTY SHOPPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3493831Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POKA DOTT TRINKET & PARTY SHOPPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Fair Oaks Ranch, CA
Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Fair Oaks Ranch, CA
Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Fair Oaks Ranch, CA
Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Gibbons
3936 S SEMORAN BLVD STE 330ORLANDO, FL 32822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail party supply and paper goods store services specializing in balloons, paper goods, cards, gifts, decorations, gift wrap, food and costumes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Bishop Creek Investment Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named POKA DOTT TRINKET & PARTY SHOPPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |