USPTO serial 78454664
HAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OTT, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith N. Yung
KEITH N YUNG LAW OFFICE OF KEITH N YUNG13621 ROOSEVELT AVE STE 308FLUSHING, NY 11354-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Plumbing, bathroom and kitchen metal hardware, namely, handles, knobs, bolts, and pulls, clothes hooks, and metal door hinges, catches, guards, holders, and door stops; and metal locks | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |