Drawing for SNOWSHOE MAGAZINE

USPTO serial 78454824

SNOWSHOE MAGAZINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNOWSHOE MAGAZINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tom Ripp

TOM RIPP BOATRIGHT, RIPP & SHARPE LLC4315 WADSWORTH BLVDWHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033-4621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing an on-line magazine in the field of Snowshoeing; First use date was by the applicant's predecessor in titleACTIVEJan 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 8, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 6, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 27, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance