USPTO serial 78454825
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Paige Younkins
L PAIGE YOUNKINS ANDERSEN, TATE, MAHAFFEY & MCGARITY PC1505 LAKES PKWY STE 100LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software for use in the field of Driver Education and Training featuring driver education content creation, testing, and reporting in the area of tests, driver educational information modules, presentations, and worksheets delivered in multiple medias, such as html, scripts, word processing documents, and presentation media; and for maintaining a database of records for attendance, behind the wheel hours, simulation hours, and for automatic scoring, testing, and tracking, multi-level reporting, licensing and performance, and roll-up of all driver education data for statistical gathering and decision making in the field of Driver Education and Training together with associated user and instruction manuals sold therewith; all of which constitute electronic media | ACTIVE | Sep 25, 2004 |
| 041 | Driver Education and Training Services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and individual training sessions all in the field of Driver Education and Training, using technology-aided curricula and products to train students to drive; instructor-led training, reinforced by CD-delivered software content and Internet-based Training Modules and testing, visually engaging screen exercises for hazard identification, video segments, educational instruction with support documentation including facilitator and participant workbooks, training to use administrative features including an Electronic Grade Book, and guidelines for behind-the-wheel instruction; all of such services constituting Education | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 2004 |
| 042 | Driver education computer services and software design, namely, driver education software design and implementation and technical support thereof, namely troubleshooting of computer software problems, delivered as both an Internet hosted solution provided via a global computer network and delivered on CD or like magnetic media for use in the field of driver education; Technical support services and software services namely consultation on software-usage for others and troubleshooting of software problems in the area of customized driver education content, provided by specialists in the area of driver safety, education, and computer technology | ACTIVE | Sep 25, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |