Drawing for ROADWISE

USPTO serial 78454825

ROADWISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROADWISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. Paige Younkins

L PAIGE YOUNKINS ANDERSEN, TATE, MAHAFFEY & MCGARITY PC1505 LAKES PKWY STE 100LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Software for use in the field of Driver Education and Training featuring driver education content creation, testing, and reporting in the area of tests, driver educational information modules, presentations, and worksheets delivered in multiple medias, such as html, scripts, word processing documents, and presentation media; and for maintaining a database of records for attendance, behind the wheel hours, simulation hours, and for automatic scoring, testing, and tracking, multi-level reporting, licensing and performance, and roll-up of all driver education data for statistical gathering and decision making in the field of Driver Education and Training together with associated user and instruction manuals sold therewith; all of which constitute electronic mediaACTIVESep 25, 2004
041Driver Education and Training Services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and individual training sessions all in the field of Driver Education and Training, using technology-aided curricula and products to train students to drive; instructor-led training, reinforced by CD-delivered software content and Internet-based Training Modules and testing, visually engaging screen exercises for hazard identification, video segments, educational instruction with support documentation including facilitator and participant workbooks, training to use administrative features including an Electronic Grade Book, and guidelines for behind-the-wheel instruction; all of such services constituting EducationACTIVESep 24, 2004
042Driver education computer services and software design, namely, driver education software design and implementation and technical support thereof, namely troubleshooting of computer software problems, delivered as both an Internet hosted solution provided via a global computer network and delivered on CD or like magnetic media for use in the field of driver education; Technical support services and software services namely consultation on software-usage for others and troubleshooting of software problems in the area of customized driver education content, provided by specialists in the area of driver safety, education, and computer technologyACTIVESep 25, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 5, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 4, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 23, 2006ISMRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 5, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 22, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance