USPTO serial 78454831
Serial No. 78454831
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78454831?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH ST FL 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-6314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | barrettes; hair bands; buttons for clothing; zippers; brooches made of non-precious metal; silk ribbons; shoe laces; cloth patches for clothing; braids; needle cushions; sewing kits comprising buttons for clothing, needles and thread; buckles for belts not of precious metal; shirt collar buttons | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coffee; cocoa; chocolate beverages, namely, hot chocolate; tea leaves for use in making beverages; non-alcoholic tea-based beverages; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; tea-based beverages sweetened with sweeteners; herbal food beverage infusions made of verdant grass; coffee based beverages containing milk; cocoa based beverages; chocolate powder; ice cream; seasonings; instant seasonings for frozen meat, seafood and vegetables; gravy; health vinegar; natural sweetener in the nature of fructose; honey; sweets, namely, candy and sweet buns; crackers; bread; pudding; steamed buns; rice; pounded wheat; cereal products, namely, breakfast cereal and processed cereal; tapioca balls; porridge, instant noodles; noodles; mint candy strips; tofu pudding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 23, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |