USPTO serial 78454907
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank R. Jakes
Frank R. Jakes JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LL403 E MADISON ST STE 400TAMPA, FL 33602-4614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |