Drawing for THINKPLACE

USPTO serial 78454973

THINKPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINKPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Tognino

Alexander Tognino INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGNORTH CASTLE DRIVEARMONK, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, brochures, magazines, newsletters, reference books, press releases, catalogs, pamphlets, instructional materials and manuals in the field of information technology and computer products and services; educational publications, namely, training manuals in the field of information technology and computer products and servicesACTIVE—
035Retail store services, retail showroom services featuring the goods of others, on-line retail store services, providing online showrooms for the goods of others, arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions, and arranging and conducting business conferences, all in the field of information technology and computer products and services; business consulting services; business management and consultation; consumer research, market research and analysis; licensing of computer softwareACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting on-line exhibitions, displays, interactive exhibits, programs, educational demonstrations, workshops, seminars, computer education and training, all in the field of information technology and computer products and services; entertainment services in the nature of information technology and computer shows, not including trade shows or trade show exhibitions; special event planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 9, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance