USPTO serial 78455075
GR-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- EDGE, KATRINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GR-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HORSHOLM, DK
London, Ontario, CA
HORSHOLM, DK
London, Ontario, CA
HØRSHOLM, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Brozenic
Amy Brozenic Lathrop GPM LLP2323 Grand Blvd, Suite 800Kansas City, MO 64108United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Lactobacillus for use as a component part of pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements; pharmaceuticals, namely, probiotics for the restoration of urogenital health, treatment of urogenital infections and the maintenance of healthy urogenital flora; medicinal preparations for the restoration of urogenital health, the treatment of urogenital infections and the maintenance of healthy urogenital flora | ACTIVE | May 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHR. HANSEN A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Urex Biotech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHR. HANSEN A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Urex Biotech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHR. HANSEN A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GR-1
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |