CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KOI

USPTO serial 78455283

KOI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael N. Cohen

Michael N. Cohen, Esq. Cohen I.P. Law Group, P.C.9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 301Beverly Hills, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Japanese style cuisine, namely, frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 25, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 17, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 16, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 20, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 2, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 2, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance