Drawing for VICTORY BOWL

USPTO serial 78455471

VICTORY BOWL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICTORY BOWL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Scott Weide

R. Scott Weide Weide & Miller. Ltd.Bank West Building, Suite 5307251 West Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 530Las Vegas, NV 89128

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming machines, namely, bingo-related gaming machines and slot machines, used with external display panels on the gaming machines and with various screen displays in the software used to run the machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance