USPTO serial 78455506
WEARABLE MOBILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEARABLE MOBILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota-shi, JP
Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota-shi, JP
Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Kera
DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, t/a Toyota Motor Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named WEARABLE MOBILITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |