Drawing for IDEAS QUE INSPIRAN VIDA

USPTO serial 78455522

IDEAS QUE INSPIRAN VIDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEAS QUE INSPIRAN VIDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Charles Saunders

Wm. Charles Saunders AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP1800 Concord PikeOW2Wilmington, DE 19850

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005full line of pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—
010Catheters; nebulizers for respiration therapy; hypodermic syringes; inhalers for therapeutic use sold emptyACTIVE—
042Scientific research and design for others in the field of pharmaceuticals; design and development of computer hardware and software for othersACTIVE—
044Medical services; veterinary services; healthcare services; advisory services relating to healthcareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance