Drawing for CONTOUR SELECT AIR SLEEP SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78455624

CONTOUR SELECT AIR SLEEP SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTOUR SELECT AIR SLEEP SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Carrillo

MICHAEL A CARRILLO NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 N LASALLE ST STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60602-3963UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Beds, mattresses, box springs, and pillowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 19, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Mar 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 26, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance