Drawing for SECURITYGUARD

USPTO serial 78455774

SECURITYGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURITYGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William K. Wells, Jr.

WILLIAM K WELLS JR KENYON & KENYON1500 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1257UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware unit installed on vehicles and for use as a security alarm system, integratable with GPS, with cellular communications capabilities and expandable with other customized inputs and outputs, for use in the transportation industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 19, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance