Drawing for Serial No. 78455850

USPTO serial 78455850

Serial No. 78455850

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78455850?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Maoz

Michael Maoz Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP1177 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Mortgage lending, mortgage banking, and mortgage brokerage services; origination, acquisition, servicing, securitization and brokerage of mortgage loans and secured and unsecured consumer loans; servicing mortgage loans; home equity loans; auto loans; credit cards and servicing of credit card receivables; unsecured consumer loan financing services; loan processing; loan collections; bill payment services; money order services; debit and stored value card services and direct deposit of funds into customer bank accounts; wire transfer servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 30, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance