USPTO serial 78455966
NEOMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3078642Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEOMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka, JP
Osaka, JP
Osaka, JP
HITACHI KINZOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Damping devices using permanent magnets for bridge cables; printing or bookbind machines and apparatus, namely, torque limiters using permanent magnets for paper feed devices in printing machines; metalworking machines and tools, namely, stages for metalworking machines and tools using linear motors including built-in permanent magnets; semi-conductor manufacturing machines and apparatus, namely, linear motors using permanent magnets for semiconductor manufacturing machines and systems, and elecrtomagnetic actuators using permanent magnets for semiconductor manufacturing machines and systems; waste separating machines and apparatus using permanent magnets for separating iron waste and aluminum waste; and parts for non-electric prime movers for land vehicles, namely, rotors for linear motors for prime movers using permanent magnets for railway rolling stocks, rotors for motors for prime movers using permanent magnets for hybrid electric-powered bicycles, and rotors for motors for prime movers using permanent magnets for electric automobiles or hybrid electric automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEOMAX CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NEOMAX CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NEOMAX CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HITACHI KINZOKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named NEOMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |