Drawing for BEHAVIORAL RELEVANCE INDEX

USPTO serial 78456021

BEHAVIORAL RELEVANCE INDEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEHAVIORAL RELEVANCE INDEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Lowe

DAVID A LOWE BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM701 5TH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for online data warehousing and data mining, and user manuals sold therewith as a unit; computer software for analytical processing and data analysis using predictive modeling to facilitate management of information; computer software for performing electronic business transactions via a secured global computer network; computer systems comprised of software and hardware for use in accessing computer applications over a global computer network; computer software for access, management, and electronic transmission of data and documents via a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Commercial information agencies, namely, providing business information and marketing data to others; data processing services; computerized real-time and delayed transactional data management services, namely, searching, gathering, processing, organizing and disseminating transactional information related to market, supplier and purchasing trends for others via a global computer network; providing market, supplier and purchasing trends information pertaining to computerized real-time and delayed transactional data management via the Internet; providing computerized analytical data processing and business data analysis services that use predictive modeling to facilitate management of business information; providing information about computerized analytical data processing and business data analysis services via the InternetACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of data; consultation in the field of electronic computer storage of dataACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, hosting the business websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; customized searching, namely, providing information at the specific request of end users by means of global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance