Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78456117?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78456117. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns Serial No. 78456117?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78456117, the listed owner(s) include: Daniel A. Mendoza.

What is USPTO serial number 78456117?

Serial number 78456117 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark Serial No. 78456117. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of Serial No. 78456117?

Serial No. 78456117 (78456117) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover Serial No. 78456117?

The public record lists International Classes: 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78456117

Serial No. 78456117

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Jul 24, 2004
Status date: Apr 22, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78456117?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Daniel A. Mendoza
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Daniel A. Mendoza

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
042	Providing extraction and retrieval of information and data mining by means of local and global computer networks and hyperlinking; providing information from searchable indexes and databases of information and hyperlinks, including text, electronic documents, databases, graphic and audio visual information, by means of local and global computer information networks	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 22, 2010	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Mar 8, 2010	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Mar 2, 2010	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Feb 16, 2010	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Feb 16, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 11, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Aug 10, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 9, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 9, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 9, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 9, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 31, 2006	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jan 30, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jan 30, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jan 26, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 13, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 13, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 28, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 26, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Nov 26, 2005	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 30, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 3, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—