USPTO serial 78456420
JOSEF STRAUSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with JOSEF STRAUSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, CA
MONTREAL H2V 4L1, CA
Montreal, CA
Montreal, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda L. Swaim
Amanda L. Swaim HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely, table cutlery, forks, knives, spoons; kitchen knives, namely, bread knives, butcher knives, paring knives, utility knives, cheese knives, butter spreaders, hand-operated double choppers, steak knives; pizza slicers; kitchen utensils, namely, non-electric can openers, lemon zesters, cheese slicers, pizza cutters; meat tenderizers, namely, hand-operated meat hammers; apple corers; and hand-operated choppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cookware, namely, casseroles, dutch ovens, frying pans, stockpots, non-electric griddles, steamers, pots and pans of all sizes, non-electric kettles, fish poachers, non-electric pressure cookers; and copperware cookware, namely, pots and pans of all sizes, stock pots, fish poachers, non-metal oil cans sold empty, dutch ovens, casseroles, non-electric kettles, canister sets, and frying pans; household utensils, namely, garlic presses, kitchen ladles, turners, skimmers, pasta serving forks, bottle openers; food mills, namely, spice mills and hand operated vegetable mills, ice cream scoops, pastry brushes, pastry wheels, potato mashers, pepper mills, cheese graters, and whisks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orly Global Trading Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLY CUISINE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Orly Global Trading Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Orly Global Trading Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named JOSEF STRAUSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |