CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FOCUS BIO-INOVA

USPTO serial 78456757

FOCUS BIO-INOVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOCUS BIO-INOVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erika K. Mikkelsen

ERIKA K MIKKELSEN PATTERSON, BELKNAP, WEBB & TYLER LLP1133 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 22NEW YORK, NY 10036-6731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data management of laboratory test results and logistical management of human specimens and isolates of microorganismsACTIVE—
042Clinical laboratory testing services, namely, scientific and research testing of human, animal and environmental specimens and isolates of microorganisms; scientific research services in the nature of epidemiological studies for late-phase clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance; conducting monitoring services and diagnostic services for all phases of clinical trialsACTIVE—
044Medical imaging services for all phases of clinical trials; medical testing of human, animal and environmental specimens and isolates of microorganismsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance