Drawing for S

USPTO serial 78457009

S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Lynn Perry

E LYNN PERRY PERRY IP GROUP100 DRAKE'S LANDING RD STE 100GREENBRAE, CA 94904UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Workshop and training services in the field of water and wastewater treatment, water resources, and environmental investigation, compliance and decommissioningACTIVEJul 7, 2004
042(Based on Intent to Use) Engineering services and technical consultation for utilities in the areas of engineering design, water treatment, transmission and distribution, water storage facilities, water reclamation and reuse systems, groundwater wells, pumping stations, hydraulic modeling, utility optimization, and integrated water resource planning; engineering services and technical consultation for industrial, commercial, and federal sectors in the areas of soil, groundwater and air monitoring and remediation, plant and facility permitting, environmental compliance, and decommissioningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance