USPTO serial 78457060
GEWEFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GEWEFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
Burladingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
Burladingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
Burladingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Kriegsman
Edward M. Kriegsman Kriegsman & Kriegsman30 Turnpike Road, Suite 9Southborough, MA 01772UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cutting machines for metal, wood and plastic material; motors and engines, not for land vehicles; tool holding fixtures, namely chucks, collets, drilling chucks, milling machine collet chucks, tapping chucks, tapping chucks with or without length compensation, tapping chucks with or without tension and compression, expanding chucks, quick-change chucks, short-holding chucks, shrink chucks; inserts with slipping clutches for quick-change tapping chucks with or without coolant feed, hydraulic collet chucks; holding chucks, drill chucks, milling machine collet chucks, tapping chucks, expanding chucks, quick-change chucks, short-holding chucks, shrink chucks, inserts with slipping clutches for quick-change tapping chucks with or without coolant feed, hydraulic collet chucks, all of fore-mentioned chucks with facing stops; machine spindles; modular tool systems, comprised of tool holders, expanding adapters, taper adapters, reducing adapters, combi-shell end mill arbors, roughing cutters, collet chucks, end collet reducing sockets, drill chucks, indexable insert drills, tap holders, tap adapters, boring bars, boring bar blanks, back-boring bars, enlargers, namely expanding adapters, and reducers, namely reducing adapters, reducing socket for milling cutters, collet chuck extensions, double and single cutters, boring heads, automotive adaptors; machine tools, namely boring bars, boring heads, cone-holders, centering holders, milling arbors, shell end mill arbors, holding arbors, precision boring inserts; drills for metal, wood and plastic material, milling cutters, gear cutters; drilling tools, namely drill bits, drill heads, chuck-extension pieces, draw-in rods for tool shanks, rough milling heads; components for mounting and dismounting machine tools, namely tool holders on metal working machines, adaptor sleeves, reducing sleeves; modular machine tool holders | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by GEWEFA Josef C. Pfister GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named GEWEFA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |