USPTO serial 78457064
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting an annual festival featuring oyster-related celebrations, food, crafts, art, cooking demonstrations, oyster eating contests, and oyster shucking contests | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |