USPTO serial 78457221
Serial No. 78457221
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3294666Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 78457221?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LEVY
MARK LEVY HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP80 EXCHANGE STREETP.O. BOX 5250BINGHAMTON, NY 13901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental materials, namely, dental alloys, dental amalgams, and dental cements; and dental implants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2004 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, hats, baseball caps, gloves, jackets, underwear, t-shirts, bras, underpants, socks, shoes, sneakers, sandals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |