Drawing for FIREXBOARD

USPTO serial 78457589

FIREXBOARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIREXBOARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason C. Creasman

JASON C CREASMAN KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Fire-resistant, non-combustible (according to British Standard 476-- Part 4 and American Society for Testing and Materials E136-04), moisture-resistant, non-toxic, and non-metal boards and panels for structural and non-structural construction that are suitable for outdoor useACTIVEDec 18, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 3, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 26, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 26, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 23, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 23, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 22, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance