USPTO serial 78457589
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason C. Creasman
JASON C CREASMAN KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Fire-resistant, non-combustible (according to British Standard 476-- Part 4 and American Society for Testing and Materials E136-04), moisture-resistant, non-toxic, and non-metal boards and panels for structural and non-structural construction that are suitable for outdoor use | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |