USPTO serial 78457674
MIDNIGHT CLUB 3: DUB EDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIDNIGHT CLUB 3: DUB EDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPMET LIFE BLDG200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer video game software; electronic game programs; video game disks and cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |