USPTO serial 78458046
CHUKKA CHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHUKKA CHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions; perfumery and perfumes, essential oils; soaps; cosmetics; bath preparations, hair lotions and preparations, skin care preparations, nail care preparations, shampoos; talcum powder; toiletries;deodorants | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Articles of eyewear, sunglasses; spectacles; cases, chains, cords and frames for sunglasses and spectacles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials; animal skins, hides, trunks and travelling bags, attache cases; backpacks; bags; briefcases; handbags; key cases, purses, rucksacks; suitcases;wallets; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, whips, ha ness and saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, headgear; coats, jackets; suits; skirts; dresses; jumpers; pullovers; blouses; trousers; slacks; jeans, shorts; dungarees, shirts; [shirts; sweatshirts; sports shirts, sweaters; hats; ties; scarves, belts; gloves;swimwear and beachwear pyjamas; nightdresses socks; underwear, hosiery; knitwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roderick Charles Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CHUKKA CHA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |