USPTO serial 78458922
RE-SOLVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RE-SOLVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Beran
MARTIN J BERAN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, namely, provision of medical and pharmaceutical information via the internet directed to the treatment and prevention of thrombosis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named RE-SOLVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |