USPTO serial 78459055
TONUME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TONUME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Smith
PAUL SMITH SMITHS IP1367 West BroadwaySUITE 400Vancouver, B.C., V6H4A7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | facial creams, body lotions, shampoos, massage oils, bath oils, bath salts, hand creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | vitamins and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | pre-recorded exercise and instructional videos; pre-recorded audio CD's; weigh scales | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | heart monitors to be worn during exercise | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | books in the field of exercise | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, sweatshirts, t-shirts, sweatpants, socks, shorts, headbands, wristbands; headwear, namely, hats, visors, caps; footwear, namely, casual, dress and athletic shoes, sneakers and sandals; women's clothing, namely, sweatshirts, t-shirts, sweatpants, socks, shorts, headbands, wristbands; headwear, namely, hats, visors, caps; footwear, namely, casual, dress and athletic shoes, sneakers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | exercise equipment, namely, travel gyms in the nature of manually operated exercise equipment, home gyms comprised of weight benches, leg curl pulley, exercise machines and weight lifts, exercise bikes, rowing machines,exercise treadmills, exercise weights, exercise balls, personal exercise mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | prepackaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | prepackaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | consulting services in the field of health, fitness and, nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Adrian, Kathryn
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TONUME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |