USPTO serial 78459107
AERIOS ORDER CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AERIOS ORDER CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER E SCHLATTER
JENNIFER E SCHLATTER ALLEN & VELLONE PCSTE 11001600 STOUT STDENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized online ordering services in the field of printing, marketing and advertising materials in which customers may customize orders; order fulfillment services; advertising and marketing consulting services, namely, assisting others in creating and develop marketing, advertising and communication materials; providing information via a website on a global computer network in the field of marketing and advertising administration and communication; establishing and maintaining accounts used to purchase goods and services on the internet; and services in the field of printing; maintaining corporate and brand identity for others; providing a password-protected website for buyers of printing, fulfillment and direct mail services; providing interactive business management and marketing information online via a password-protected website; monitoring and tracking of marketing materials shipments for others; providing an online database featuring generic and customizable images for use by others in preparing advertising and marketing materials | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of electronic data; electronic transmission and retrieval of messages, images, documents and data via a global computer network; providing multiple user access to global computer information network; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning ordering and purchasing of marketing materials and tracking orders and shipment of the orders | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
| 039 | Electronic storage of client files, records, documents and data | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
| 040 | providing information via a website on a global computer network in the field of printing | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software featuring an interactive calendar; data encryption services; document data transfer and physical conversion services from one media to another | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aerios Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AERIOS ORDER CENTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |