Drawing for BEST OF OHIO FOODS

USPTO serial 78459240

BEST OF OHIO FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3003093Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2005
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BEST OF OHIO FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John B Hardaway III

JOHN B HARDAWAY III NEXSEN PRUET LLCPO BOX 10107GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by arranging sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with expositions, fairs and sporting eventsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 27, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance