USPTO serial 78459656
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Merton E. Thompson
MERTON E THOMPSON BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TRANSMISSION OF MEDIA FILES VIA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FOR A AND COMMUNITY AREAS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND FILES AMONG USERS AND GROUPS OF USERS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE FOR A FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND FILES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING GENERAL INTEREST TOPICS | ACTIVE | Oct 13, 2004 |
| 041 | COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AUTHORING, COLLABORATION , SOCIAL NETWORKING AND CONTENT MANAGEMENT TOOLS ONLINE IN ORDER TO ENABLE USERS AND GROUPS OF USERS TO SHARE ENTERTAINMENT, MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION CONTENT | ACTIVE | Oct 13, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |